IfcX and IfcLite projects

[ReD_CoDE]

IFC Modernization : Relationships

I’m not a programmer, but because of our existing startup I have to learn the existing solution as much as I can, at least general things So, as I know generally, if a data structure has a “structured form” it’s better use “relational databases” --> SQL If the data structure is “complex and unstructured” form then is better use “Object-Oriented database” So, the IFC data structure is complex? Unstructured? If not, why was it originally developed based on Object-Oriented approach? So I thin…

IFC Modernization : Relationships

So, who will build IFC SQLite? As we know, it’s “an unfinished project” inside the buildingSMART Also, as you say an ID, but that ID should be GUID/UUID? It seems that GUID/UUID is an old-fashioned approach today

Where can I find computer interpretable descriptions for IFC4Add2?

I had the same idea for IfcOWL too https://forums.buildingsmart.org/t/ifcowl-is-now-live-at-standards-buildingsmart-org/1049/3?u=red_code It not only can help programmers know each entity and other types or classes inside the files, but also can used as a guidance inside the software (for instance as a hover) which guides user However, for instance in IFC4 ADD2, there are 776 Entities, and over 2000 Types, Functions, Rules, Property Sets and Individual Properties And IFC files come as pure/r…

How to map between IFC and Product Data Templates in buildingSMART Data Dictionary (bSDD)?

We have the same approach and has started to focus on SQLite schema development SQL schema will reduce entities and other classes which will bring a better performance I think SQLite is great to develop schemas and databases based on And JSON is good for real-time usages like IoT usages