Hi,
I am working on exporting IFC file for both cylinder and cone geometries (in fact my geometry are MSB(manifold solid brep) solid/surface body) under IFC4 schema DTV mvd. I found I have two ways to represent cylinder geometry:
by IfcAdvancedBrep / IfcShellBasedSurfaceModel with underline surface as IfcCylindricalSurface.
by creating a IfcRightCircularCylinder object.
Does it make sense to use #1 to generate ifc entity for this case? Or what’s the criteria of exporting either MSB or CSG in general?
At the same time I also have cone type MSB but seems IFC MSB don’t have equavilant types but only IfcRightCircularCone (CSG) type, what’s the recommended representation for conic solid/surface body in IFC?
Also, what’s the consideration for not using IfcRightCircularCone? thttps://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/DEV/IFC4_2/FINAL/HTML/schema/ifcgeometricmodelresource/lexical/ifcrightcircularcone.htm
I see no reason not to use ifcRightCircularCone for a not tapered cone.
Both are ifcGeometricRepresentationItem, see inheritance (extract without ifc-prefix):
Thank you @bsbock! I see solid cone representation is quite flexible. however if we want keep surface cone body (with the cone information), then ifcRightCircularCone /ifcExtrudedAreaSolidTapered can’t fit well. Instead I noticed there is a IfcSurfaceOfRevolution can act as inner geometry type to make consistent in typo for AdvancedBrep and ShellBasedSurfaceModel.