Where i can i personally try to avoid any of these abbreviations. It creates many confusion.
Bim
Level x
Industry x
Where i can i personally try to avoid any of these abbreviations. It creates many confusion.
Bim
Level x
Industry x
These abbreviations donât cause confusion
The majority of them and their goals are clear, but do you know, âchange is painful, so normally many try to avoidâ
However, all big changes has happened through small groups who knew what they wanted and werenât following norms
I wonât follow technologies and methodologies that are based on 30-10 years ago
What ânormâ is it that you donât follow, and i do?
I donât talk about you Hans, please donât see this personal
I just say we need new methodologies and technologies, and IFC improvements
And I think I shared enough about everything
About SysML/UML about Modelica and what am I want today? Which I think some bSI friends realized
Thereâs almost 3-4 years I follow âSystem of Systemsâ goal and I think today technology gives us enough power to build platforms that support many things that were separated before
Itâs the time for combine, not integrate, GIS, BIM (BLM), PLM, âŠ
So, IFC âcanâ be the main choice if has improvements and be update
Nothing personal. Just trying to understand your plans and struggles with ifc
Weâve focused on:
Also, like VFX industry and its software I want IfcOwnerHistory
supports all logs that end user be able to has a full control on her/his design and implementation efforts. Be able to come back to the nodes she/he wants and changes them easily. Like what we see in video/cinematic production
Sounds like weâre on different paths indeed
I donât know whatâs your path, but if itâs AI-based, should say that today AI is a general âmaterialâ in every solution
But AI is a general word, the solution and the method matter most